gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:40618 eng UTF8 dataset Office of Response and Restoration resourceProvider ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov pointOfContact 2025-05-15T19:16:04 ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data ISO 19115-2:2009(E) complex 3292 curve 323547 point 3293 surface 4684 Sensitivity of Coastal Environments and Wildlife to Spilled Oil: Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington: MGT (Management Area Polygons) WA_Puget_Sound_mgt 2006-07 publication NOAA/NMFS/EDM 40618 https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/40618 WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Full Metadata Record View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset. information https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Citation URL Online Resource download Funding was provided by Navy Region Northwest. This data set was prepared by Concurrent Technologies Corporation, Bremerton, Washington, and Sound GIS, Seattle, Washington with support from Research Planning, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina, for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington. This data set contains polygons that represent the following sensitive human-use management areas in Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington: aquaculture sites, commercial fishing areas, Indian reservations, marine sanctuaries, Nature Conservancy areas, national parks, recreational fishing areas, state parks, subsistence areas, wildlife refuges, and other management areas. Location-specific type and source information is stored in relational data tables (described below) designed to be used in conjunction with this spatial data layer.This data set comprises a portion of the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) data for Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington. ESI data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil. The ESI data include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources. See also the SOCECON (Socioeconomic Resource Points and Lines) data layer, part of the larger Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca ESI database, for additional human-use information. The ESI data were collected, mapped, and digitized to provide environmental data for oil spill planning and response. The Clean Water Act with amendments by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires response plans for immediate and effective protection of sensitive resources. This project was funded by Navy Region Northwest and was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington. completed ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov pointOfContact ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov custodian notPlanned Environmental Monitoring theme NOS Topic Category Coastal Zone Management Coastal resources ESI Human use resources Management areas Oil spill planning Sensitivity maps Wildlife theme Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington place DOC/NOAA/NOS/ORR > Office of Response and Restoration, National Ocean Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce dataCentre Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords 2017-04-24 publication 8.5 Earth Science Data and Information System, Earth Science Projects Division, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD%2BKeywords GCMD Keyword Forum Page Global Change Master Directory (GCMD). 2025. GCMD Keywords, Version 22. Greenbelt, MD: Earth Science Data and Information System, Earth Science Projects Division, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). URL (GCMD Keyword Forum Page): https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD+Keywords information custodian Washington (Puget Sound & Strait of Juan de Fuca), 2006 project InPort otherRestrictions Cite As: Office of Response and Restoration, [Date of Access]: Sensitivity of Coastal Environments and Wildlife to Spilled Oil: Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington: MGT (Management Area Polygons) [Data Date Range], https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/40618. NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose. otherRestrictions Access Constraints: None otherRestrictions Use Constraints: DO NOT USE MAPS FOR NAVIGATIONAL PURPOSES.Besides the above warning, there are no use constraints on these data. Note that the ESI database should not be used to the exclusion of other pertinent data or information held by state or federal agencies or other organizations. Likewise, information contained in the database cannot be used in place of consultations with environmental, natural resource, and cultural resource agencies, or in place of field surveys. Recognize that the information contained in the ESI database represents known concentration areas or occurrences of natural, cultural, and human-use resources, but does not necessarily represent the full distribution or range of each species or resource. This is particularly important to recognize when considering potential impacts to protected resources, such as endangered species, wetlands, etc. Acknowledgment of the originators, publishers, contributors, and sources listed would be appreciated in products derived from these data. otherRestrictions Distribution Liability: Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by NOAA regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. NOAA warrants the delivery of this product in computer-readable format, and will offer a replacement copy of the product when the product is determined unreadable by computer-input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. unclassified NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP) NOAA/NMFS/EDM 40618 https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inportserve/waf/noaa/nos/orr/dmp/pdf/40618.pdf WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP) NOAA Data Management Plan for this record on InPort. information crossReference vector eng; US environment oceans The software packages used to develop the atlas are Environmental Systems Research Institute's ARC/INFO(r) (version 9.1) and SQL SERVER(r) (version 2000). The hardware configuration is PC's with Windows Operating System (2000/XP/2003).The Spatial_Data_Organization_Information section refers only to the source files in the ARC export format. The following files are included in the data set: birds.e00, esi.e00, fish.e00, fishl.e00, habitatl.e00, habitats.e00, hydro.e00, index.e00, invert.e00, m_mampt.e00, mgt.e00, nests.e00, socecon.e00. Associated relational and desktop data tables provided in Arc export and text format are bio_lut, biofile, biores, breed, breed_dt, seasonal, soc_dat, soc_lut, sources, species, and status. -124.751 -122.126 47 49 | Currentness: The data were compiled during 2005-2006. The currentness dates for the data range from 1989 to 2006 and are documented in the Lineage section. 1989 2006 Resource Description - ESI Atlas for Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington false eng false MGT.PAT 2017-08-08 publication SOC_LUT 2017-08-08 publication SOC_DAT 2017-08-08 publication SOURCES 2017-08-08 publication ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov distributor https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi Online Resource download dataset Accuracy A multi-stage error checking process is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. The process includes a standardized data entry methodology, hardcopy data review by in-house and external resource experts, a final Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process, and multiple automated logical consistency checks. Quantitative data (such as densities, counts, abundances, or concentrations) provided by resource experts for inclusion in the data set may vary widely in attribute accuracy, depending upon the methodology used to collect and compile such data. For a more detailed evaluation of source data attribute accuracy, contact the sources listed in the Lineage section. Horizontal Positional Accuracy Spatial components for the human-use data layers can come from expert interviews, hardcopy, or digital sources. Most of the spatial components of the human-use data layers are developed from pre-existing digital or hardcopy sources and reflect the positional accuracy of these original data. Some of the spatial components of the human-use data layers are compiled on hardcopy base maps with a scale of 1:24,000. See the Lineage and Process_Description sections for more information on the original data source and how these data were integrated or manipulated to create the final data set. Completeness Report These data represent a synthesis of digital boundaries for management areas. See also the SOCECON (Socioeconomic Resource Points and Lines) data layer, part of the larger Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington ESI database, for additional human-use information. These data do not necessarily represent all management areas in Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca. Conceptual Consistency A multi-stage error checking process, described in the above Attribute_Accuracy_Report, is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. This process includes multiple automated logical consistency checks that test the files for missing or duplicate data, rules for proper coding, GIS topological consistencies (such as dangles, unnecessary nodes, etc.), and SQL SERVER(r) to ARC/INFO(r) consistencies. A final review is made by the GIS manager, where the data are written to CD-ROM and the metadata are written. After the data are delivered to NOAA, they are again subjected to a number of quality and consistency checks. Aquaculture: Digital polygons representing aquaculture facilities were provided by Washington State Department of Health (WDOH) and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). WDOH's growing areas were included where the class was defined as "approved" or "conditional." Cultured mussels from WDFW's Marine Resource Database were also included as aquaculture sites. In order to depict the aquaculture sites as water-bound polygons, they were clipped with the water portion of the HYDRO layer. Any resulting land-based aquaculture sliver polygons were removed from the MGT layer. Where the polygons appeared to follow the shoreline but fell short, they were extended to meet the shoreline. Commercial and Recreational Fishing: Digital polygons representing commercial fishing and recreational fishing areas were provided by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Marine Resource Database. The following layers were included as commercial and recreational fishing areas: demersal, reef, and pelagic (where demersal, reef and pelagic field = 1, respectively). The salmoncm features were included as commercial fishing areas where the "intense" and "everyone" field = 1. The salmonsp features were included as recreational fishing areas where the "sportsalmo" field = 1. In order to depict the commercial fishing and recreational fishing sites as water-bound polygons, they were clipped with the water portion of the HYDRO layer. Any resulting land-based sliver polygons were removed from the MGT layer. Where the polygons appeared the follow the shoreline but fell short, they were extended to meet the shoreline. Indian Reservations: Digital polygons representing Indian reservation boundaries were provided by the following groups: Jamestown S'klallam Tribe, Lummi Indian Business Council, Makah Tribe, Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE), and Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). Only those reservation boundaries from WDOE and WDNR that were not already included from the tribal groups were included. Management Areas: Digital polygons representing marine managed areas were provided by NOAA's Marine Protected Area (MPA) Center. Additional marine preservation areas were provided by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Marine Resource Database. Marine Sanctuaries: Digital polygons representing National Estuarine Research Reserve System boundaries were provided by NOAA's MPA Center. The Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary (OCNMS) boundary was provided by OCNMS. Nature Conservancy Areas: Digital polygons representing lands managed by The Nature Conservancy were provided by the Washington Chapter of The Nature Conservancy. National Parks: The Olympic National Park boundary was provided by Olympic National Forest as a digital polygon feature. The boundaries of National Historic Parks and Reserves in the study area were provided by Washington Department of Transportation. State Parks: Digital polygons representing state parks were provided by Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. Subsistence: Digital polygons representing subsistence areas were gathered from the salmoncm layer provided by WDFW. Only those polygons where the field "treaty" = 1 were included. Wildlife Refuges: Digital polygons representing wildlife refuge boundaries were provided by the Makah Tribe and NOAA's MPA Center. 2006-03-01T00:00:00 The above digital and/or hardcopy sources were compiled by the project biologist to create the MGT data layer. Depending on the type of source data, three general approaches are used for compiling the data layer: (1) information gathered during initial interviews and from hardcopy sources are compiled onto U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles and digitized; (2) hardcopy maps are digitized at their source scale; (3) digital data layers are evaluated and used "as is" or integrated with the hardcopy data sources. See the Lineage section for additional information on the type of source data for this data layer. 2006-03-01T00:00:00 The compiled ESI, biology, and human-use data are plotted onto hardcopy draft maps. Following the delivery of draft maps to the participating resource experts, a second set of interviews is conducted to review the maps. If necessary, edits to the MGT data layer are made based on the recommendations of the resource experts, and final hardcopy maps and digital data are created. 2006-05-01T00:00:00 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: DOWNLOADABLE DATA 24000 ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS 1998-01-01 publication OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST 1989 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: DOWNLOADABLE DATA 24000 COMMERCIAL SHELLFISH GROWING AREAS 2005-01-01 publication WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 2005 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: CD-ROM GIS DATA: LUMMI NATION 2004 2004-01-01 publication LUMMI INDIAN BUSINESS COUNCIL 2004 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: EMAIL GIS DATA: MAKAH TRIBE 2004-01-01 publication MAKAH TRIBE 1994 2000 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: CD-ROM JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE GIS DATA 2004-01-01 publication JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE 2004 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: CD-ROM MARINE FINFISH, SHELLFISH AND BASELINE GIS COVERAGES, PUBLISHED MAP FILES AND THE WEB VERSION OF TECHNICAL REPORT 79 2005-01-01 publication WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 1992 2005 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: DOWNLOADABLE DATA MARINE MANAGED AREAS OF THE UNITED STATES 2005-01-01 publication NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) 1997 2006 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: DOWNLOADABLE DATA 24000 NATIONAL PARKS OF WASHINGTON STATE 1999-01-01 publication WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1996 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: EMAIL OLYMPIC COAST NATURAL MARINE SANCTUARY 1997-01-01 publication OLYMPIC COAST NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY 1997 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: EMAIL PARK BOUNDARIES 2005-01-01 publication WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2005 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: DOWNLOADABLE DATA WAFO FEE OWNERSHIP AND CONSERVATION EASEMENTS 2004-01-01 publication THE NATURE CONSERVANCY 2003 2004 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: DOWNLOADABLE DATA WASHINGTON STATE NON-DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MAJOR PUBLIC LANDS 2005-01-01 publication WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2000 2003 Source Contribution: MGT INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: DOWNLOADABLE DATA 100000 WASHINGTON STATE TRIBAL LANDS 1998-01-01 publication WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 1998