gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:40611 eng UTF8 dataset Office of Response and Restoration resourceProvider ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov pointOfContact 2025-05-15T19:16:04 ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data ISO 19115-2:2009(E) curve 131072 surface 7844 Sensitivity of Coastal Environments and Wildlife to Spilled Oil: Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington: FISHL (Fish Lines) WA_Puget_Sound_fishl 2006-07 publication NOAA/NMFS/EDM 40611 https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/40611 WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Full Metadata Record View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset. information https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Citation URL Online Resource download Funding was provided by Navy Region Northwest. This data set was prepared by Concurrent Technologies Corporation, Bremerton, Washington, and Sound GIS, Seattle, Washington with support from Research Planning, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina, for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington. This data set contains sensitive biological resource data for marine, estuarine, and anadromous fish in Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington. Vector lines in this data set represent anadromous fish spawning runs and spawning beaches for forage fish. Species-specific abundance, seasonality, status, life history, and source information are stored in relational data tables (described below) designed to be used in conjunction with this spatial data layer.This data set comprises a portion of the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) data for Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington. ESI data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil. The ESI data include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources. See also the FISH (Fish Polygons) data layer, part of the larger Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca ESI database, for additional fish information. The ESI data were collected, mapped, and digitized to provide environmental data for oil spill planning and response. The Clean Water Act with amendments by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires response plans for immediate and effective protection of sensitive resources. This project was funded by Navy Region Northwest and supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington. completed ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov pointOfContact ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov custodian notPlanned Environmental Monitoring theme NOS Topic Category Coastal Zone Management Coastal resources ESI Fish Oil spill planning Sensitivity maps Wildlife theme Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington place DOC/NOAA/NOS/ORR > Office of Response and Restoration, National Ocean Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce dataCentre Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords 2017-04-24 publication 8.5 Earth Science Data and Information System, Earth Science Projects Division, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD%2BKeywords GCMD Keyword Forum Page Global Change Master Directory (GCMD). 2025. GCMD Keywords, Version 22. Greenbelt, MD: Earth Science Data and Information System, Earth Science Projects Division, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). URL (GCMD Keyword Forum Page): https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD+Keywords information custodian Washington (Puget Sound & Strait of Juan de Fuca), 2006 project InPort otherRestrictions Cite As: Office of Response and Restoration, [Date of Access]: Sensitivity of Coastal Environments and Wildlife to Spilled Oil: Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington: FISHL (Fish Lines) [Data Date Range], https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/40611. NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose. otherRestrictions Access Constraints: None otherRestrictions Use Constraints: DO NOT USE MAPS FOR NAVIGATIONAL PURPOSES.Besides the above warning, there are no use constraints on these data. Note that the ESI database should not be used to the exclusion of other pertinent data or information held by state or federal agencies or other organizations. Likewise, information contained in the database cannot be used in place of consultations with environmental, natural resource, and cultural resource agencies, or in place of field surveys. Recognize that the information contained in the ESI database represents known concentration areas or occurrences of natural, cultural, and human-use resources, but does not necessarily represent the full distribution or range of each species or resource. This is particularly important to recognize when considering potential impacts to protected resources, such as endangered species, wetlands, etc. Acknowledgment of the originators, publishers, contributors, and sources listed would be appreciated in products derived from these data. otherRestrictions Distribution Liability: Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by NOAA regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. NOAA warrants the delivery of this product in computer-readable format, and will offer a replacement copy of the product when the product is determined unreadable by computer-input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. unclassified NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP) NOAA/NMFS/EDM 40611 https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inportserve/waf/noaa/nos/orr/dmp/pdf/40611.pdf WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP) NOAA Data Management Plan for this record on InPort. information crossReference vector eng; US environment oceans The software packages used to develop the atlas are Environmental Systems Research Institute's ARC/INFO(r) (version 9.1) and SQL SERVER(r) (version 2000). The hardware configuration is PC's with Windows Operating System (2000/XP/2003).The Spatial_Data_Organization_Information section refers only to the source files in the ARC export format. The following files are included in that data set: birds.e00, esi.e00, fish.e00, fishl.e00, habitatl.e00, habitats.e00, hydro.e00, index.e00, invert.e00, m_mampt.e00, mgt.e00, nests.e00, socecon.e00. Associated relational and desktop data tables provided in Arc export and text format are bio_lut, biofile, biores, breed, breed_dt, seasonal, soc_dat, soc_lut, sources, species, and status. -124.751 -122.126 47 49 | Currentness: The biological data were compiled during 2005-2006. The currentness dates for the data range from 1990 to 2005 and are documented in the Lineage section. 1990 2005 Resource Description - ESI Atlas for Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington false eng false FISHL.AAT 2017-08-08 publication BIO_LUT 2017-08-08 publication BIORES 2017-08-08 publication SPECIES 2017-08-08 publication SEASONAL 2017-08-08 publication BREED 2017-08-08 publication SOURCES 2017-08-08 publication STATUS 2017-08-08 publication ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov distributor https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi Online Resource download dataset Accuracy A multi-stage error checking process is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. The process includes a standardized data entry methodology, hardcopy data review by in-house and external resource experts, a final Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process, and multiple automated logical consistency checks. Quantitative data (such as densities, counts, abundances, or concentrations) provided by resource experts for inclusion in the data set may vary widely in attribute accuracy, depending upon the methodology used to collect and compile such data. For a more detailed evaluation of source data attribute accuracy, contact the sources listed in the Lineage section. Horizontal Positional Accuracy Spatial components for the biological data layers can come from expert interviews, hardcopy, or digital sources. Some of the spatial components of the biological data layers may have been developed using regional experts who estimate concentration areas. It is difficult to estimate the positional accuracy of such data, except to state that they are compiled on hardcopy base maps with a scale of 1:24,000. Some of the spatial components of the biological data sets are developed from pre-existing digital or hardcopy sources and reflect the positional accuracy of these original data. See the Lineage and Process_Description sections for more information on the original data source and how these data were integrated or manipulated to create the final data set. Note that biological resource data by their very nature are considered "fuzzy", and this should be understood when considering the positional accuracy of vector digital objects representing these resources. Completeness Report These data represent a synthesis of digital data on salmonid and forage fish spawning areas. This information was adapted from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Marine Species database and WDFW's Washington Lakes and Rivers Information System database. Contact WDFW for additional information on these databases. See also the FISH (Fish Polygons) data layer, part of the larger Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca ESI database, for additional fish information. These data do not necessarily represent all marine, estuarine, and anadromous fish occurrences in Puget Sound and Strait of Juan de Fuca. The following species are included in this data set: (Species_ID, Common Name, Scientific Name [n/a if not applicable]): 9, Rock sole, Lepidopsetta bilineata; 69, Coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch; 70, Pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha; 71, Sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka; 75, Surf smelt, Hypomesus pretiosus; 80, Pacific sand lance, Ammodytes hexapterus; 490, Chinook salmon (fall), Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (fall); 493, Chinook salmon (spring), Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (spring); 962, Steelhead (summer), Oncorhynchus mykiss (summer); 963, Steelhead (winter), Oncorhynchus mykiss (winter); 965, Chinook salmon (summer), Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (summer); 993, Chum salmon (summer), Oncorhynchus keta (summer); 994, Chum salmon (fall), Oncorhynchus keta (fall); 1080, Native char, Salvelinus spp.; 1081, Chum salmon (winter), Oncorhynchus keta (winter). Conceptual Consistency A multi-stage error checking process, described in the above Attribute_Accuracy_Report, is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. This process includes multiple automated logical consistency checks that test the files for missing or duplicate data, rules for proper coding, GIS topological consistencies (such as dangles, unnecessary nodes, etc.), and SQL SERVER(r) to ARC/INFO(r) consistencies. A final review is made by the GIS manager, where the data are written to CD-ROM and the metadata are written.After the data are delivered to NOAA, they are again subjected to a number of quality and consistency checks. In the process of checking for topological and database consistencies, new ID's and RARNUM's or HUNUM's are also generated. The new ID's are a combination of atlas number, element number, and record number. In addition, the value used to represent the element is modified to reflect the type of feature being mapped. In the case of an element that is normally represented by a point or polygon, a value of 20 is added to the standard element value for mapping of linear features. In the case where an element usually mapped as a polygon is represented by a point, a value of 30 is added to the regular element value. The RARNUM's are also modified to include the atlas number, so multiple atlases can be combined and RARNUM's remain unique. RARNUM's are redefined on an element basis, so "resource at risk" groupings will contain only a single element. HUNUM's are also modified to include the atlas number. Two sources of data were used to depict anadromous species and forage fish locations for this data layer: (1) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Marine Species database, and (2) WDFW's Washington Lakes and Rivers Information System database.From the WDFW Marine Species database, we extracted lines delineating smelt, sand lance, and rock sole spawning beaches. From WDFW's Washington Lakes and Rivers Information System database, we processed the ARC/INFO route and event data to determine the combination of anadromous species that were associated with each line segment. Concentration and seasonality information was provided by resource experts, or was extracted from published sources, reports, and survey data.The above digital and/or hardcopy sources were compiled by the project biologist to create the FISHL data layer. Depending on the type of source data, three general approaches are used for compiling a biology data layer: (1) information gathered during initial interviews and from hardcopy sources are compiled onto U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles and digitized; (2) hardcopy maps are digitized at their source scale; (3) digital data layers are evaluated and used "as is" or integrated with the hardcopy data sources. See the Lineage section for additional information on the type of source data for this data layer. 2006-03-01T00:00:00 The compiled ESI, biology, and human-use data are plotted onto hardcopy draft maps. Following the delivery of draft maps to the participating resource experts, a second set of interviews is conducted to review the maps. If necessary, edits to the FISHL data layer are made based on the recommendations of the resource experts, and final hardcopy maps and digital data are created. 2006-05-01T00:00:00 Source Contribution: FISHL INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: BOOK | Type of Source Media: paper DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN WEST COAST ESTUARIES VOLUME 1: DATA SUMMARIES 1990-01-01 publication NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE 1990 Source Contribution: FISHL INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: REPORT | Type of Source Media: online FINAL BULL TROUT AND DOLLY VARDEN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2000-01-01 publication WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE (WDFW) 2000 Source Contribution: FISHL INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: CD-ROM MARINE FINFISH, SHELLFISH AND BASELINE GIS COVERAGES, PUBLISHED MAP FILES AND THE WEB VERSION OF TECHNICAL REPORT 79 2005-01-01 publication WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE (WDFW) 1992 2005 Source Contribution: FISHL INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: REPORT | Type of Source Media: paper STATUS REVIEW OF CHINOOK SALMON FROM WASHINGTON, IDAHO, OREGON, AND CALIFORNIA 1998-01-01 publication MYERS, J.M., R.G. KOPE, G.J. BRYANT, D. TEEL, L.J. LIERHEIMER, T.C. WAINWRIGHT, W.S. GRANT, F.W. WAKNITZ, K. NEELY, S.T. LINDLEY, AND R.S. WAPLES 1998 Source Contribution: FISHL INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: REPORT | Type of Source Media: paper STATUS REVIEW OF CHUM SALMON FROM WASHINGTON, OREGON, AND CALIFORNIA 1997-01-01 publication JOHNSON, O.W., W.S. GRANT, R.G. KOPE, K. NEELY, F.W. WAKNITZ, R.S. WAPLES 1997 Source Contribution: FISHL INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: REPORT | Type of Source Media: paper STATUS REVIEW OF WEST COAST STEELHEAD FROM WASHINGTON, IDAHO, OREGON, AND CALIFORNIA 1996-01-01 publication BUSBY, P.J., T.C. WAINWRIGHT, G.J. BRYANT, L.J. LIERHEIMER, R.S. WAPLES, F.W. WAKNITZ, AND I.V. LAGOMARSINO 1996 Source Contribution: FISHL INFORMATION | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: CD-ROM 24000 WASHINGTON LAKES AND RIVERS INFORMATION SYSTEM (WLRIS) 2005-01-01 publication WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE (WDFW) 2004