gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:40264 eng UTF8 dataset Office of Response and Restoration resourceProvider ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov pointOfContact 2025-05-15T19:16:06 ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data ISO 19115-2:2009(E) complex 78 curve 18495 point 78 surface 104 Columbia River ESI: MGT (Management Area Polygons) Columbia_river_WA_OR_mgt 2004-11 publication NOAA/NMFS/EDM 40264 https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/40264 WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Full Metadata Record View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset. information https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Citation URL Online Resource download Prepared by Research Planning, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington; Coastal Storms Initiative; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; NOAA Fisheries; State of Oregon; and State of Washington. This data set contains sensitive human-use data for Wildlife Refuges, National Forests, and State Parks for the Columbia River area. Vector polygons in this data set represent the management areas. Location-specific type and source information is stored in relational data tables (described below) designed to be used in conjunction with this spatial data layer.This data set comprises a portion of the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) data for Columbia River. ESI data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil. The ESI data include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources. See also the SOCECON (Socioeconomic Resource Points and Lines) data layer, part of the larger Columbia River ESI database, for additional human-use information. The ESI data were collected, mapped, and digitized to provide environmental data for oil spill planning and response. The Clean Water Act with amendments by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires response plans for immediate and effective protection of sensitive resources. This project was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington; Coastal Storms Initiative; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; NOAA Fisheries; State of Oregon; and State of Washington. completed ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov pointOfContact ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov custodian notPlanned Environmental Monitoring theme NOS Topic Category Coastal Zone Management Coastal resources ESI Management Area Oil spill planning Sensitivity maps Wildlife theme Columbia River place DOC/NOAA/NOS/ORR > Office of Response and Restoration, National Ocean Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce dataCentre Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords 2017-04-24 publication 8.5 Earth Science Data and Information System, Earth Science Projects Division, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD%2BKeywords GCMD Keyword Forum Page Global Change Master Directory (GCMD). 2025. GCMD Keywords, Version 22. Greenbelt, MD: Earth Science Data and Information System, Earth Science Projects Division, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). URL (GCMD Keyword Forum Page): https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/app.php/tag/GCMD+Keywords information custodian Columbia River (Washington/Oregon), 2004 project InPort otherRestrictions Cite As: Office of Response and Restoration, [Date of Access]: Columbia River ESI: MGT (Management Area Polygons) [Data Date Range], https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/40264. NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose. otherRestrictions Access Constraints: None otherRestrictions Use Constraints: DO NOT USE MAPS FOR NAVIGATIONAL PURPOSES.Besides the above warning, there are no use constraints on these data. Note that the ESI database should not be used to the exclusion of other pertinent data or information held by state or federal agencies or other organizations. Likewise, information contained in the database cannot be used in place of consultations with environmental, natural resource, and cultural resource agencies, or in place of field surveys. Recognize that the information contained in the ESI database represents known concentration areas or occurrences of natural, cultural, and human-use resources, but does not necessarily represent the full distribution or range of each species or resource. This is particularly important to recognize when considering potential impacts to protected resources, such as endangered species, wetlands, etc. Acknowledgment of the originators, publishers, contributors, and sources listed would be appreciated in products derived from these data. otherRestrictions Distribution Liability: Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by NOAA regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. NOAA warrants the delivery of this product in computer-readable format, and will offer a replacement copy of the product when the product is determined unreadable by computer-input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. unclassified NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP) NOAA/NMFS/EDM 40264 https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inportserve/waf/noaa/nos/orr/dmp/pdf/40264.pdf WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP) NOAA Data Management Plan for this record on InPort. information crossReference vector eng; US environment oceans The software packages used to develop the atlas are Environmental Systems Research Institute's ARC/INFO(r) (version 8.3) and SQL SERVER(r) (version 7.0). The hardware configuration is PC's with Windows Operating System (NT4.0/2000).The Spatial_Data_Organization_Information section refers only to the source files in the ARC export format. The following files are included in that data set: birds.e00, esi.e00, fish.e00, fishl.e00, habitats.e00, hydro.e00, index.e00, invert.e00, m_mammal.e00, m_mampt.e00, mgt.e00, nests.e00, nwi.e00, reptiles.e00, socecon.e00, t_mammal.e00. Associated relational and desktop data tables provided in Arc export and text format are bio_lut, biofile, biores, breed, breed_dt, runs_dat, seasonal, soc_dat, soc_lut, sources, species, and status. -124.125 -120.67375 45.3 46.375 | Currentness: The MGT data were compiled during 2003-2004. The currentness dates for the data range from 1981 to 2004 and are documented in the Lineage section. 1981 2004 Resource Description - ESI Atlas for Columbia River false eng false MGT.PAT 2017-08-07 publication SOC_LUT 2017-08-07 publication SOC_DAT 2017-08-07 publication SOURCES 2017-08-07 publication ESRI File Geodatabase ESI Program Manager 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 orr.esi@noaa.gov distributor https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/oil-and-chemical-spills/oil-spills/download-esi-maps-and-gis-data WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link ColRiver_2004_GDB.zip download dataset Accuracy A multi-stage error checking process is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. The process includes a standardized data entry methodology, hardcopy data review by in-house and external resource experts, a final Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process, and multiple automated logical consistency checks. Quantitative data (such as densities, counts, abundances, or concentrations) provided by resource experts for inclusion in the data set may vary widely in attribute accuracy, depending upon the methodology used to collect and compile such data. For a more detailed evaluation of source data attribute accuracy, contact the sources listed in the Lineage section. Horizontal Positional Accuracy The MGT data set was developed from pre-existing digital sources and reflects the positional accuracy of these original data. See the Lineage and Process_Description sections for more information on the original data source and how these data were integrated or manipulated to create the final data set. Completeness Report These data represent a synthesis of digital boundaries for management areas. These data do not necessarily represent all management area sites in the Columbia River region. See also the SOCECON (Socioeconomic Resource Points and Lines) data layer, part of the larger Columbia River ESI database, for additional human-use information. Conceptual Consistency A multi-stage error checking process, described in the above Attribute_Accuracy_Report, is used to verify both attribute accuracy and logical consistency throughout data production. This process includes multiple automated logical consistency checks that test the files for missing or duplicate data, rules for proper coding, GIS topological consistencies (such as dangles, unnecessary nodes, etc.), and SQL SERVER(r) to ARC/INFO(r) consistencies. A final review is made by the GIS manager, where the data are written to CD-ROM and the metadata are written.After the data are delivered to NOAA, they are again subjected to a number of quality and consistency checks. In the process of checking for topological and database consistencies, new ID's and RARNUM's or HUNUM's are also generated. The new ID's are a combination of atlas number, element number, and record number. In addition, the value used to represent the element is modified to reflect the type of feature being mapped. In the case of an element that is normally represented by a point or polygon, a value of 20 is added to the standard element value for mapping of linear features. In the case where an element usually mapped as a polygon is represented by a point, a value of 30 is added to the regular element value. The RARNUM's are also modified to include the atlas number, so multiple atlases can be combined and RARNUM's remain unique. RARNUM's are redefined on an element basis, so "resource at risk" groupings will contain only a single element. HUNUM's are also modified to include the atlas number. Digital vector lines used to depict management areas (State Parks) for Washington in this data layer were provided by Washington Department of Parks and Recreation. Boundaries for the Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge complex (Washington) were provided by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Management boundaries for the state of Oregon were digitized from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Digital Raster Graphics (DRGs). The MGT data layer was incorporated into an ArcInfo system along with the SOCECON and biology data layers, and hardcopy draft maps were created using U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles as base maps. Following the creation of draft maps, a second set of interviews were conducted with the resource experts. Participants who were unable to attend the meetings were sent a set of maps to review. Edits to the MGT data layer were based on the recommendations of the resource experts, and final hardcopy maps were created. 2004-08-01T00:00:00 Source Contribution: Wildlife Refuge boundaries | Source Geospatial Form: Expert Knowledge | Type of Source Media: Personal communication Distribution of Fish, Birds, Plants, and Mammals in the Columbia River 2004-02-01 publication Clark, A., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2004-02 Source Contribution: Sauvie Island Wildlife Area boundary | Source Geospatial Form: Expert Knowledge | Type of Source Media: Personal communication Distribution of Wildlife on Sauvie Island and Surrounding Areas 2004-02-01 publication Nebeker, M., Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) 2004-02 Source Contribution: Regional park boundaries | Source Geospatial Form: Hardcopy Map | Type of Source Media: paper 250000 Hoquiam Washington-Oregon, Pacific Coast Ecological Inventory 1981-01-01 publication U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1981 Source Contribution: Oregon state park boundaries | Source Geospatial Form: Hardcopy atlas | Type of Source Media: paper 150000 Oregon Atlas and Gazetteer 2001-01-01 publication DeLorme 2001 Source Contribution: Ridgefield National Wildlife Complex boundaries | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: electronic mail system 24000 Ridgefield National Wildlife Complex Boundaries 2004-01-01 publication Anderson, E., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2004 Source Contribution: Oregon state park boundaries | Source Geospatial Form: raster digital data | Type of Source Media: online 24000 USGS Digital Raster Graphics University of Washington Source Contribution: Washington state park boundaries | Source Geospatial Form: vector digital data | Type of Source Media: electronic mail system 24000 Washington State Park Boundaries 2004-01-01 publication Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission 2004